JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 8, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Yepes Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Superior jerárquico común
Conflicto De Competencia De Tutela
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y distintos distritos judiciales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se abstuvo de resolver el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre dos Juzgados civiles del circuito en la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Departamento del Valle del Cauca, y, en su lugar, se ordenó enviar el expediente a la Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que adopte la decisión que corresponda, toda vez que es su superior jerárquico.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Abstenerse de resolver el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre los Juzgados 1o Civil del Circuito de Cali y el Juzgado 5o Civil del Circuito de Palmira Valle, en la accion de tutela promovida por Juan Carlos Yepes Munoz, contra el Departamento del Valle del Cauca, y, en su lugar, se ordena el envio del expediente a la Sala de Casacion Civil y Agraria de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que por ella se adopte la decision que corresponda.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.